Home  ›  Roles of African American Men in the Family Make Up

Roles of African American Men in the Family Make Up

Written By Saturday, March 5, 2022 Add Comment Edit

The family structure of African Americans has long been a matter of national public policy interest.[2] A 1965 report past Daniel Patrick Moynihan, known as The Moynihan Report, examined the link between blackness poverty and family unit construction.[ii] Information technology hypothesized that the destruction of the black nuclear family unit structure would hinder further progress toward economic and political equality.[2]

When Moynihan wrote in 1965 on the coming devastation of the black family, the out-of-wedlock nascence rate was 25% among black people.[3] In 1991, 68% of black children were born outside of marriage (where 'matrimony' is divers with a authorities-issued license).[4] In 2011, 72% of black babies were born to unmarried mothers,[five] [6] while the 2018 National Vital Statistics Report provides a effigy of 69.iv percent for this status.[7]

Among all newlyweds, eighteen.0% of black Americans in 2015 married non-black spouses.[8] 24% of all black male person newlyweds in 2015 married outside their race, compared with 12% of blackness female person newlyweds.[8] 5.5% of black males married white women in 1990.[ix]

History [edit]

An African American family, photographed between 1918-22. Courtesy of the DeGolyer Library, Southern Methodist University.

According to information extracted from 1910 U.S. Census manuscripts, compared to white women, black women were more than likely to get teenage mothers, stay single and accept spousal relationship instability, and were thus much more than probable to live in female person-headed unmarried-parent homes.[10] [xi] This pattern has been known as black matriarchy considering of the observance of many households headed by women.[11]

The breakdown of the black family was outset brought to national attention in 1965 past sociologist and afterwards Democratic Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, in the groundbreaking Moynihan Written report (also known as "The Negro Family: The Instance For National Action").[12] Moynihan's report made the argument that the relative absence of nuclear families (those having both a married father and mother present) in blackness America would greatly hinder further blackness socio-economic progress.[12]

The current virtually widespread African-American family unit construction consisting of a single parent has historical roots dating dorsum to 1880.[13] A study of 1880 family unit structures in Philadelphia, showed that 3-quarters of black families were nuclear families, composed of two parents and children.[fourteen] Information from U.South. Census reports reveal that between 1880 and 1960, married households consisting of 2-parent homes were the most widespread form of African-American family structures.[thirteen] Although the about popular, married households decreased over this fourth dimension period. Single-parent homes, on the other hand, remained relatively stable until 1960; when they rose dramatically.[thirteen]

In the Harlem neighborhood of New York City in 1925, 85 percent of kin-related black households had ii parents.[15] When Moynihan warned in his 1965 report on the coming destruction of the black family, however, the out-of-wedlock birthrate had increased to 25% among the blackness population.[12] This effigy connected to rise over time and in 1991, 68% of black children were born outside of marriage.[16] U.Due south. Demography data from 2010 reveal that more than African-American families consisted of unmarried mothers than married households with both parents.[17] In 2011, it was reported that 72% of blackness babies were born to unmarried mothers.[xi] As of 2015, at 77.3 percent, black Americans have the highest rate of non-marital births amid native Americans.[xviii]

In 2016 29% of African Americans were married, while 48% of all Americans were. Also, 50% of African Americans accept never been married in contrast to 33% of all Americans. In 2016 just under half (48%) of black women had never been married which is an increase from 44% in 2008 and 42.seven% in 2005. 52% of black men had never been married. Also, 15% percentage of blackness men were married to non-black women which is up from 11% in 2010. Black women were the least probable to ally non-black men at merely vii% in 2017.[19]

The African-American family structure has been divided into a twelve-office typology that is used to testify the differences in the family structure based on "gender, marital status, and the presence or absence of children, other relatives or non-relatives."[20] These family sub-structures are divided up into three major structures: nuclear families, extended families, and augmented families.

African-American families at a glance [edit]

African-American nuclear families [edit]

Andrew Billingsley'southward research on the African-American nuclear family is organized into four groups: Incipient Nuclear, Simple Nuclear, Segmented Nuclear I, and Segmented Nuclear II.[twenty] In 1992 Paul Glick supplied statistics showing the African-American nuclear family unit structure consisted of 80% of total African-American families in comparing to 90% of all US families.[21] Co-ordinate to Billingsley, the African-American incipient nuclear family structure is defined as a married couple with no children.[20]

In 1992 47% of African-American families had an incipient nuclear family in comparing to 54% of all US incipient nuclear families.[22] The African-American simple nuclear family structure has been defined as a married couple with children.[20] This is the traditional norm for the composition of African-American families.[23] In 1992 25% of African-American families were simple nuclear families in comparison to 36% of all US families.[22] Near 67 percent of blackness children are built-in into a single parent household.[24]

The African-American segmented nuclear I (unmarried mother and children) and II (unmarried begetter and children) family structures are divers as a parent–kid relationship.[20] In 1992, 94% of African-American segmented nuclear families were equanimous of an unmarried mother and children.[22] Glick's inquiry found that unmarried parent families are twice as prevalent in African-American families every bit they are in other races, and this gap continues to widen.[21]

African-American extended families [edit]

Billingsley's inquiry continued with the African-American extended family structure, which is composed of primary members plus other relatives.[20] Extended families have the same sub-structures as nuclear families, incipient, elementary, segmented I, and segmented II, with the addition of grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins and additional family members. Billingsley'southward research institute that the extended family structure is predominantly in the segmented I sub-structured families.[xx]

In 1992 47% of all African-American extended families were segmented extended family structures, compared to 12% of all other races combined.[25] Billingsley'due south research shows that in the African-American family the extended relative is often the grandparents.[26]

African-American augmented families [edit]

Billingsley'due south research revealed another type of African-American family, called the augmented family structure, which is a family composed of the master members, plus nonrelatives.[20] Billingsley's case study found that this family structure accounted for 8% of black families in 1990.[27] This family structure is different from the traditional norm family unit discussed earlier, it combines the nuclear and extended family units with nonrelatives. This construction also has the incipient, simple, segmented I, and segmented II sub-structures.[20]

Not-family unit households [edit]

Billingsley introduced a new family structure that branches from the augmented family unit structure.[27] The African-American population is starting to see a new structure known as a non-family household. This non-family household contains no relatives.[28] Co-ordinate to Glick in 1992, 37% of all households in the United States were a nonfamily household, with more than half of this percentage being African-Americans.[29]

African-American interracial marriages [edit]

Amid all newlyweds, 18.0% of Black Americans in 2015 married someone whose race or ethnicity was different from their own.[8] 24% of all Blackness male newlyweds in 2015 married exterior their race, compared with 12% of Black female newlyweds.[8]

In the U.s.a. there has been a historical disparity between Black female and Back male exogamy ratios. There were 354,000 White female/Black male and 196,000 Black female person/White male marriages in March 2009, representing a ratio of 181:100.[30]

This traditional disparity has seen a rapid decline over the terminal two decades, contrasted with its peak in 1981 when the ratio was still 371:100.[31] In 2007, four.6% of all married Black people in the Us were midweek to a White partner, and 0.4% of all Whites were married to a Black partner.[32]

The overall rate of African-Americans marrying non-Black spouses has more than tripled between 1980 and 2015, from 5% to 18%.[eight]

African-American family members at a glance [edit]

East. Franklin Frazier has described the current African-American family structure every bit having two models, i in which the father is viewed every bit a patriarch and the sole breadwinner, and i where the mother takes on a matriarchal role in the place of a fragmented household.[33] In defining family, James Stewart describes information technology as "an institution that interacts with other institutions forming a social network."[23]

Stewart's research concludes that the African-American family has traditionally used this definition to structure institutions that upholds values tied to other black institutions resulting in unique societal standards that bargain with "economics, politics, education, health, welfare, constabulary, culture, organized religion, and the media."[34] Ruggles argues that the mod black U.S. family has seen a change in this tradition and is now viewed as predominantly unmarried parent, specifically blackness matriarchy.[13]

Male parent representative [edit]

In 1997, McAdoo stated that African-American families are "ofttimes regarded equally poor, fatherless, dependent of governmental help, and involved in producing a multitude of children outside of wedlock."[35] Thomas, Krampe and Newton evidence that in 2005 39% of African-American children did not live with their biological male parent and 28% of African-American children did not live with any male parent representative, compared to fifteen% of white children who were without a begetter representative.[36] In the African-American culture, the father representative has historically acted as a role model for two out of every 3 African-American children.[37]

Thomas, Krampe, and Newton relies on a 2002 survey that shows how the begetter's lack of presence has resulted in several negative effects on children ranging from education operation to teen pregnancy.[38] Whereas the father presence tends to take an opposite effect on children, increasing their chances on having a greater life satisfaction. Thomas, Krampe, and Newton's enquiry shows that 32% of African-American fathers rarely to never visit their children, compared to 11% of white fathers.[36]

In 2001, Hamer showed that many[ vague ] African-American youth did not know how to approach their father when in his presence.[39] This survey besides concluded that the non resident fathers who did visit their kid said that their office consisted of primarily spending time with their children, providing subject area and existence a role model.[twoscore] John McAdoo also noted that the residential male parent office consists of beingness the provider and decision maker for the household.[41] This concept of the father'due south role resembles the theory of hegemonic masculinity. Quaylan Allan suggests that the continuous comparison of white hegemonic masculinity to black manhood, can also add a negative issue on the presence of the begetter in the African-American family unit construction[42]

Female parent representative [edit]

Melvin Wilson suggests that in the African-American family structure a mother's role is determined by her relationship status, is she a single mother or a married mother?[43] Co-ordinate to Wilson, in most African-American married families a mother's roles is dominated by her household responsibilities.[44] Wilson research states that African American married families, in contrast to White families, do not accept gender specific roles for household services.[45] The mother and wife is responsible for all household services around the house.[44]

Co-ordinate to Wilson, the married mother's tasks effectually the house is described as a full-time task. This full-fourth dimension task of household responsibilities is often the 2d job that an African-American woman takes on.[45] The outset job is her regular 8 hour work day that she spends outside of the dwelling. Wilson likewise notes that this responsibility that the mother has in the married family determines the life satisfaction of the family as a whole.[45]

Melvin Wilson states that the single mother office in the African-American family is played by 94% of African-American unmarried parents.[46] According to Brown, single parent motherhood in the African-American culture is condign more a "proactive" choice.[47] Melvin Wilson's research shows 62% of single African-American women said this choice is in response to divorce, adoption, or just non wedlock compared to 33% of single white women.[48] In this position African-American unmarried mothers run into themselves playing the role of the mother and the father.[47]

Though the role of a single mother is similar to the role of a married mother, to take care of household responsibilities and piece of work a full-time job, the single mothers' responsibility is greater since she does not have a second party income that a partner would provide for her family unit members. Co-ordinate to Brownish, this lack of a 2d party income has resulted in the bulk of African American children raised in single mother households having a poor upbringing.[49]

Child [edit]

In Margaret Spencer's case study on children living in southern metropolitan areas, she shows that children tin can only grow through enculturation of a particular society.[l] The child's development is dependent on iii areas: child-rearing practices, individual heredity, and experienced cultural patterns. Spencer'southward inquiry also concludes that African-American children have get subject field to inconsistencies in guild based on their skin color.[51] These inconsistencies continue to identify an increased amount of ecology stress on African-American families which effect in the failure of nigh African-American children to reach their total potential.[52]

Similar to about races, challenges that African-American families experience are unremarkably dependent on the children's age groups.[53] The African-American families experience a great deal of mortality within the infant and toddler age group. In particular the babe mortality rate is "twice as high for black children as for children in the nation as a whole."[53] The mortality in this age group is accompanied by a significant number of illnesses in the pre- and mail service-natal care stages, along with the failure to place these children into a positive, progressive learning surround once they become toddlers.[54] This foundation has led to African-American children facing teen pregnancy, juvenile detention, and other behavioral issues because they were not given the proper development to successfully face the world and social inconsistencies they will encounter.[54]

Extended family members [edit]

Jones, Zalot, Foster, Sterrett, and Chester executed a study examining the childrearing assistance given to young adults and African-American single mothers.[55] The majority of extended family members, including aunts, uncles, cousins, grandparents, and occasionally non-relatives, are put into this category.[55] : 673 In Jones inquiry she also notes that 97% of single mother'south ages 28–forty admitted that they rely on at least i extended family member for assistance in raising their children.[55] : 676

Extended family members have an immense amount of responsibleness in the majority of African-American families, especially single parent households. According to Jones, the reason these extended family unit members are included in having a necessary role in the family unit is because they play a key role in assuring the health and well-being of the children.[55] : 673 The extended family members' responsibilities range from child rearing, financial assist, offering a identify to live, and meals.[55] : 674

Theories [edit]

Economic theories [edit]

There are several hypotheses – both social and economic – explaining the persistence of the electric current African-American family structure. Some researchers theorize that the low economic statuses of the newly freed slaves in 1850 led to the current family structure for African Americans. These researchers suggest that extreme poverty has increased the destabilization of African American families while others signal to high female labor participation, few job opportunities for black males, and small differences betwixt wages for men and women that have decreased marriage stability for black families.[xiii]

Another economic theory dates back to the late 1950s and early on '60s, the creation of the "Human-in-the-House" rule; this restricted 2 parent households from receiving government benefits which made many blackness fathers move out to exist able to receive help to support their families. These rules were after abolished when the Supreme Court ruled against these exclusions in the example of King vs Smith.[56]

Economic status has proved to not always negatively affect single-parent homes, even so. Rather, in an 1880 census, in that location was a positive relationship between the number of blackness single-parent homes and per-capita canton wealth.[xiii] Moreover, literate immature mothers in the 1880s were less likely to reside in a habitation with a spouse than illiterate mothers.[13] This suggests that economic factors post-obit slavery lone cannot account for the family styles seen by African Americans since blacks who were illiterate and lived in the worst neighborhoods were the nigh likely to alive in a two-parent home.

Traditional African influences [edit]

Other explanations incorporate social mechanisms for the specific patterns of the African American family structure. Some researchers point to differences in norms regarding the need to live with a spouse and with children for African-Americans. Patterns seen in traditional African cultures are as well considered a source for the current trends in unmarried-parent homes. Every bit noted by Antonio McDaniel, the reliance of African-American families on kinship networks for fiscal, emotional, and social back up can be traced back to African cultures, where the emphasis was on extended families, rather than the nuclear family.[57]

Some researchers accept hypothesized that these African traditions were modified by experiences during slavery, resulting in a electric current African-American family construction that relies more than on extended kin networks.[57] The author notes that slavery caused a unique situation for African slaves in that information technology alienated them from both true African and white civilization so that slaves could not identify completely with either culture. As a effect, slaves were culturally adaptive and formed family structures that best suit their environment and situation.[57]

Mail service-1960s expansion of the U.S. welfare state [edit]

The American economists Walter E. Williams and Thomas Sowell argue that the significant expansion of federal welfare under the Bully Society programs beginning in the 1960s contributed to the destruction of African American families.[58] [59] Sowell has argued: "The black family unit, which had survived centuries of slavery and discrimination, began rapidly disintegrating in the liberal welfare state that subsidized unwed pregnancy and inverse welfare from an emergency rescue to a way of life."[59]

There are several other factors which may have accelerated decline of the blackness family structure such equally 1) The advancement of technology lessening the demand for transmission labor to more technical know-how labor; and two) The women's rights movement in general opened up employment positions increasing competition, especially from white women, in many non-traditional areas which skilled blacks may accept contributed to maintain their family unit structure in the midst of the ascent of the cost of living.[60]

Reject of blackness marriages [edit]

The charge per unit of African American wedlock is consistently lower than White Americans, and is declining.[61] These trends are so pervasive that families who are married are considered a minority family construction for blacks.[61] In 1970, 64% of developed African Americans were married. This charge per unit was cutting in half by 2004, when it was 32%.[61] In 2004, 45% of African Americans had never been married compared to only 25% of White Americans.[61]

While research has shown that marriage rates have dropped for African Americans, the nascency rate has not. Thus, the number of unmarried-parent homes has risen dramatically for black women. One reason for the low rates of African American marriages is high age of first matrimony for many African Americans. For African American women, the marriage rate increases with historic period compared to White Americans who follow the same trends but marry at younger ages than African Americans.[61]

One report found that the average age of marriage for blackness women with a loftier school degree was 21.viii years compared to 20.viii years for white women.[61] Fewer labor force opportunities and a reject in real earnings for black males since 1960 are also recognized equally sources of increasing marital instability.[63] Equally some researchers fence, these two trends have led to a pool of fewer desirable male partners and thus resulted in more divorces.

1 type of spousal relationship that has declined is the shotgun marriage.[64] This drib in charge per unit is documented by the number of out-of-wedlock births that at present normally occur.[64] Between 1965 and 1989, three-quarters of white out-of-wedlock births and three-fifths of black out-of-spousal relationship births could be explained past situations where the parents would have married in the by.[64] This is considering, prior to the 1970s, the norm was such that, should a couple accept a pregnancy out of matrimony, wedlock was inevitable.[64] Cultural norms have since changed, giving women and men more than agency to make up one's mind whether or when they should go married.[64]

Ascension in divorce rates [edit]

For African Americans who practice marry, the rate of divorce is college than White Americans. While the trend is the same for both African Americans and White Americans, with at least half of marriages for the ii groups catastrophe in divorce, the charge per unit of divorce tends to be consistently higher for African Americans.[61] African Americans also tend to spend less fourth dimension married than White Americans. Overall, African Americans are married at a afterwards age, spend less time married and are more likely to be divorced than White Americans.[61]

The decline and low success rate of black marriages is crucial for written report because many African Americans accomplish a heart-class condition through union and the likelihood of children growing upward in poverty is tripled for those in single-parent rather than two-parent homes.[61] Some researchers propose that the reason for the rise in divorce rates is the increasing acceptability of divorces. The decline in social stigma of divorce has led to a decrease in the number of legal barriers of getting a divorce, thus making it easier for couples to divorce.[63]

Blackness male incarceration and mortality [edit]

In 2006 an estimated 4.8% of blackness non-Hispanic men were in prison house or jail, compared to i.nine% of Hispanic men of whatsoever race and 0.7% of White non-Hispanic men. U.S. Agency of Justice Statistics.[65]

Structural barriers are often listed as the reason for the current trends in the African American family unit structure, specifically the turn down in matrimony rates. Imbalanced sex ratios have been cited as one of these barriers since the late nineteenth century, where Census data shows that in 1984, in that location were 99 black males for every 100 black females within the population.[61] 2003 census data shows at that place are 91 black males for every 100 females.[61]

Blackness male incarceration and higher mortality rates are often pointed to for these imbalanced sex activity ratios. Although blackness males make up 6% of the population, they make up 50% of those who are incarcerated.[61] This incarceration rate for black males increased by a rate of more than four between the years of 1980 and 2003. The incarceration rate for African American males is 3,045 out of 100,000 compared to 465 per 100,000 White American males.[61] In many areas around the country, the chance that black males will be arrested and jailed at least once in their lifetime is extremely high. For Washington, D.C., this probability is between fourscore and 90%.[61]

Because black males are incarcerated at six times the rate of white males, the skewed incarceration rates harm these black males likewise every bit their families and communities. Incarceration tin can bear on former inmates and their future in society long after they go out prison. Those that take been incarcerated lose masculinity, as incarceration tin can touch a man's confirmation of his identity as a father. Afterward beingness released from prison, efforts to reestablish or sustain connections and exist active within the family are frequently unsuccessful.[66]

Incarceration can be damaging to familial ties and tin can have a negative effect on family relations and a human being's sense of masculinity.[66] In 34 states, those who are on parole or probation are not allowed to vote, and in 12 states a felony conviction means never voting again.[67] A criminal record affects i's power to secure federal benefits or get a task, every bit one Northwestern Academy study establish that blacks with a criminal tape were the least likely to be called back for a job interview in a comparison of blackness and white applicants.[68]

Incarceration has been associated with a higher take a chance of disease, increased likelihood of smoking cigarettes, and premature death, impacting these former inmates and their ability to exist normalized in order.[67] This further impacts social structure, as studies bear witness that paternal incarceration may contribute to children's behavioral problems and lower performance in school.[69] Also, the female person partners of male inmates are more likely to endure from depression and struggle economically.[67] These furnishings contribute to the barriers impacting the African American family construction.

The mortality rates for African American males are likewise typically higher than they are for African American females. Between 1980 and 2003, 4,744 to 27,141 more than African American males died annually than African American females.[61] This college incarceration rate and bloodshed rate helps to explicate[ original inquiry? ] the low matrimony rates for many African American females who cannot find black partners.

Implications [edit]

New York's late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, photographed in 1998.

The Moynihan Report, written past Banana Secretary of Labor, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, initiated the debate on whether the African-American family structure leads to negative outcomes, such as poverty, teenage pregnancy and gaps in education or whether the opposite is true and the African American family unit construction is a effect of institutional discrimination, poverty and other segregation.[lxx] Regardless of the causality, researchers have found a consistent relationship between the current African American family structure and poverty, education, and pregnancy.[71] According to C. Eric Lincoln, the Negro family's "enduring sickness" is the absent father from the African-American family structure.[72]

C. Eric Lincoln too suggests that the implied American idea that poverty, teen pregnancy, and poor education performance has been the struggle for the African-American customs is due to the absent African-American male parent. According to the Moynihan Report, the failure of a male dominated subculture, which only exist in the African-American culture, and reliance on the matriarchal control has been greatly present in the African-American family construction for the by three centuries.[73] This absenteeism of the father, or "mistreatment", has resulted in the African-American crime charge per unit beingness higher than the National boilerplate, African-American drug habit being higher than whites, and rates of illegitimacy being at least 25% or higher than whites.[73] A family needs the presence of both parents for the youth to "learn the values and expectations of society."[72]

Poverty [edit]

Black single-parent homes headed by women still demonstrate how relevant the feminization of poverty is. Black women oftentimes work in low-paying and female-dominated occupations.[74] [ needs update ] Blackness women also make upwards a large pct of poverty-afflicted people.[74] Additionally, the racialization of poverty in combination with its feminization creates further hindrances for youth growing upward black, in single-parent homes, and in poverty.[74] For married couple families in 2007, in that location was a 5.eight% poverty rate.[75]

This number, notwithstanding, varied when considering race so that 5.4% of all white people,[76] 9.7% of blackness people,[77] and 14.9% of all Hispanic people lived in poverty.[78] These numbers increased for single-parent homes, with 26.six% of all single-parent families living in poverty,[75] 22.v% of all white single-parent people,[76] 44.0% of all single-parent black people,[77] and 33.4% of all single-parent Hispanic people[78] living in poverty.

While bulk opinion tends to center on the increase in poverty every bit a result of unmarried-parent homes, research has shown that this is not always the instance. In one study examining the furnishings of single-parent homes on parental stress and practices, the researchers institute that family structure and marital condition were non as big a factor equally poverty and the experiences the mothers had while growing up.[79] Furthermore, the authors institute piddling parental dysfunction in parenting styles and efficacy for single-mothers, suggesting that two-parent homes are not e'er the only blazon of successful family structures.[79] The authors suggest that focus should also be placed on the poverty that African Americans face as a whole, rather than just those who alive in single-parent homes and those who are of the typical African American family structure.[79]

Educational performance [edit]

In that location is consensus in the literature about the negative consequences of growing upward in unmarried-parent homes on educational attainment and success.[71] Children growing upwardly in single-parent homes are more than likely to not finish school and generally obtain fewer years of schooling than those in 2-parent homes.[71] Specifically, boys growing up in homes with only their mothers are more likely to receive poorer grades and display behavioral problems.[71]

For black high school students, the African American family structure too affects their educational goals and expectations.[71] Studies on the topic accept indicated that children growing up in single-parent homes face up disturbances in immature childhood, adolescence and immature adulthood besides.[71] Although these effects are sometimes minimal and contradictory, it is generally agreed that the family structure a child grows upward in is of import for their success in the educational sphere.[71] This is specially important for African American children who have a fifty% hazard of beingness born outside of marriages and growing up in a home with a single-parent.[79]

Some arguments for the reasoning backside this drib in attainment for single-parent homes point to the socioeconomic problems that ascend from mother-headed homes. Particularly relevant for families centered on black matriarchy, 1 theory posits that the reason children of female-headed households do worse in educational activity is because of the economic insecurity that results because of single maternity.[71] Single parent mothers ofttimes accept lower incomes and thus may be removed from the home and forced to work more hours, and are sometimes forced to motility into poorer neighborhoods with fewer educational resources.[71]

Other theories point to the importance of male role models and fathers in particular, for the development of children emotionally and cognitively, especially boys.[71] Fifty-fifty for fathers who may not be in the home, studies take shown that time spent with fathers has a positive relationship with psychological well-being including less depression and anxiety. Additionally, emotional support from fathers is related to fewer malversation problems and lower drug and marijuana use.[80]

Teen pregnancy [edit]

Teenage and unplanned pregnancies pose threats for those who are afflicted by them with these unplanned pregnancies leading to greater divorce rates for young individuals who marry after having a kid. In one study, sixty% of the young married parents had separated within the first five years of marriage.[81] Additionally, as reported in 1 article, unplanned pregnancies are often cited as a reason for young parents dropping out, resulting in greater economical burdens and instabilities for these teenage parents later on.[81]

Another study found that paternal attitudes towards sexuality and sexual expression at a immature age were more likely to make up one's mind sexual behaviors by teens regardless of maternal opinions on the thing.[81] For these youths, the opinions of the begetter affected their behaviors in positive ways, regardless of whether the parent lived in or out of the dwelling house and the age of the student.[81] Some other study looking at how mother–daughter relationships affect teenage pregnancy establish that negative parental relationships led to teenage daughters dating later, getting significant earlier, and having more sex activity partners.[82]

Teens who lived in a married family accept been shown to have a lower risk for teenage pregnancy.[83] Teenage girls in unmarried-parent families were six times more than likely to get pregnant and 2.8 times more likely to engage in sex at an earlier age than girls in married family unit homes.[84]

Criticism and support [edit]

Cosby and Poussaint'southward criticism of the single-parent family [edit]

Bill Cosby has criticized the current state of single-parenting dominating blackness family structure. In a spoken language to the NAACP in 2004, Cosby said, "In the neighborhood that most of us grew up in, parenting is not going on. You have the pile-upward of these sweet beautiful things born by nature—raised past no 1."[85]

In Cosby's 2007 book Come On People: On the Path from Victims to Victors, co-authored with psychiatrist Alvin Poussaint, Cosby and Poussaint write that "A house without a male parent is a claiming," and that "A neighborhood without fathers is a ending."[85] Cosby and Poussaint write that mothers "have difficulty showing a son how to be a man," and that this presents a problem when there are no male parent figures around to show boys how to channel their natural aggressiveness in effective means.[85] Cosby and Poussaint too write, "We wonder if much of these kids' rage was born when their fathers abased them."[85]

Cosby and Poussaint country that verbal and emotional corruption of the children is prominent in the parenting style of some black single mothers, with serious developmental consequences for the children.[85] "Words like 'Yous're stupid,' 'You're an idiot,' 'I'm sad you were built-in,' or 'You'll never amount to anything' tin stick a dagger in a child'due south heart."[85] "Single mothers angry with men, whether their electric current boyfriends or their children's fathers, regularly transfer their rage to their sons, since they're agape to have it out on the adult males"[85] Cosby and Poussaint write that this determinative parenting environs in the black unmarried parent family leads to a "wounded anger—of children toward parents, women toward men, men toward their mothers and women in full general".[85]

Policy proposals [edit]

Authors Angela Hattery and Earl Smith have proffered solutions to addressing the high charge per unit of blackness children being built-in out of marriage.[86] : 285–315 Iii of Hattery and Smith'south solutions focus on parental support for children, equal access to instruction, and alternatives to incarceration for nonviolent offenders. According to Hattery and Smith, African-American families are within a system that is "pitted" confronting them and in that location are some institutional solutions and private solutions that America and its citizens tin do to reduce implications associated with the African-American family structure.[86] : 315

Parental support for children [edit]

According to Hattery and Smith, around 50% of African-American children are poor considering they are dependent on a single mother.[86] : 305 In states similar Wisconsin, for a child to exist the recipient of welfare or receive the "helpmate fare", their parents must be married.[86] : 306 Hattery acknowledges one truth almost this law, which is that it recognizes that a child is "entitled" to the financial and emotional support of both parents. I of Hattery and Smith's solutions is found around the thought that an African-American kid is entitled to the financial and emotional support of both parents. The government does require the noncustodial parents to pay a percentage to their child every month, but co-ordinate to Hattery the just way this will aid eliminate child poverty is if these policies are actively enforced.[86] : 306

Education equality [edit]

For the by 400 years of America's life many African-Americans have been denied the proper teaching needed to provide for the traditional American family unit structure.[86] : 308 Hattery suggests that the schools and education resources bachelor to virtually African-Americans are under-equipped and unable provide their students with the noesis needed to be college gear up.[86] : 174 In 2005 The Manhattan Found for Policy Inquiry written report showed that even though integration has been a push more than recently, over the by 15 years there has been a thirteen% refuse in integration in public schools.[86] : 174

These same reports besides show that in 2002, 56% of African-American students graduated from loftier schoolhouse with a diploma, while 78% of whites students graduated. If students exercise not experience they are learning, they will not continue to go to schoolhouse. This conclusion is made from the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research report that stated only 23% of African-American students who graduated from public high school felt college-ready.[86] : 174 Hatterly suggests that the government invest into the African-American family by investing in the African-American children'southward didactics.[86] : 308 A solution is found in providing the aforementioned resources provided to schools that are predominantly white. According to Hatterly, through education equality the African-American family unit construction tin increase opportunities to prosper with equality in employment, wages, and health insurance.[86] : 308

Alternatives to incarceration [edit]

According to Hattery and Smith 25–33% of African-American men are spending fourth dimension in jail or prison and according to Thomas, Krampe, and Newton 28% of African-American children do not live with whatsoever father representative.[36] [86] : 310 According to Hatterly, the authorities can end this situation that many African-American children experience due to the absenteeism of their father.[86] : 285–315 Hatterly suggests probation or treatment (for alcohol or drugs) as alternatives to incarceration. Incarceration non but continues the negative assumption of the African-American family structure, but perpetuates poverty, single parenthood, and the separation of family unit units.[86] : 310

See also [edit]

Publications:

  • Is Marriage for White People?: How the African American Spousal relationship Decline Affects Everyone

General:

  • African American culture
  • Family construction in the United States
  • Feminization of poverty
  • African Americans and nativity control
  • Black genocide

References [edit]

  1. ^ *Grove, Robert D.; Hetzel, Alice M. (1968). Vital Statistics Rates in the United States 1940-1960 (PDF) (Report). Public Health Service Publication. Vol. 1677. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, U.S. Public Health Service, National Center for Wellness Statistics. p. 185.
    • Ventura, Stephanie J.; Bachrach, Christine A. (October xviii, 2000). Nonmarital Childbearing in the United States, 1940-99 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 48. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Arrangement. pp. 28–31.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady East.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Park, Melissa M. (February 12, 2002). Births: Final Data for 2000 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. fifty. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Organization. p. 46.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Park, Melissa One thousand.; Sutton, Paul D. (December eighteen, 2002). Births: Final Data for 2001 (PDF) (Study). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 51. Centers for Disease Command and Prevention, National Centre for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 47.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady Due east.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Munson, Martha L. (December 17, 2003). Births: Final Information for 2002 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 52. Centers for Illness Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 57.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Munson, Martha L. (September 8, 2005). Births: Last Data for 2003 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 54. Centers for Disease Command and Prevention, National Middle for Wellness Statistics, National Vital Statistics Organisation. p. 52.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Kirmeyer, Sharon (September 29, 2006). Births: Final Data for 2004 (PDF) (Study). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 55. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 57.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady Eastward.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Kirmeyer, Sharon; Munson, Martha L. (December 5, 2007). Births: Final Data for 2005 (PDF) (Study). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 56. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Centre for Wellness Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 57.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady East.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Menacker, Fay; Kirmeyer, Sharon; Mathews, T.J. (Jan seven, 2009). Births: Final Data for 2006 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 57. Centers for Illness Control and Prevention, National Center for Wellness Statistics, National Vital Statistics Organization. p. 54.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady Due east.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Mathews, T.J.; Kirmeyer, Sharon; Osterman, Michelle J.Thousand. (August 9, 2010). Births: Final Data for 2007 (PDF) (Study). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 58. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Wellness Statistics, National Vital Statistics Organization. p. 46.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Sutton, Paul D.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Mathews, T.J.; Osterman, Michelle J.K. (December eight, 2010). Births: Final Data for 2008 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 59. Centers for Illness Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Arrangement. p. 46.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady East.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Osterman, Michelle J.Grand.; Kirmeyer, Sharon; Mathews, T.J.; Wilson, Elizabeth C. (November 3, 2011). Births: Final Information for 2009 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. lx. Centers for Disease Command and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 46.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Osterman, Michelle J.K.; Wilson, Elizabeth C.; Mathews, T.J. (August 28, 2012). Births: Final Data for 2010 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 61. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Arrangement. p. 45.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady E.; Ventura, Stephanie J.; Osterman, Michelle J.G.; Mathews, T.J. (June 28, 2013). Births: Final Data for 2011 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 62. Centers for Affliction Command and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 43.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady Due east.; Osterman, Michelle J.K.; Curtin, Sally C. (December thirty, 2013). Births: Terminal Data for 2012 (PDF) (Report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 62. Centers for Illness Command and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 41.
    • Martin, Joyce A.; Hamilton, Brady Due east.; Osterman, Michelle J.Yard.; Curtin, Emerge C.; Mathews, T.J. (January xv, 2015). Births: Final Data for 2013 (PDF) (Written report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 64. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. p. 40.
    • Hamilton, Brady Due east.; Martin, Joyce A.; Osterman, Michelle J.Yard.; Curtin, Sally C.; Mathews, T.J. (December 23, 2015). Births: Final Data for 2014 (PDF) (Written report). National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 64. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. pp. 7 & 41.
  2. ^ a b c "Moynihan'southward War on Poverty report". Archived from the original on 2017-01-20. Retrieved 2015-07-31 .
  3. ^ Daniel P. Moynihan, The Negro Family: The Instance for National Action, Washington, D.C., Part of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor, 1965.
  4. ^ National Review, April 4, 1994, p. 24.
  5. ^ "Blacks struggle with 72 per centum unwed mothers rate", Jesse Washington, NBC News, July 11, 2010
  6. ^ "For blacks, the Pyrrhic Victory of the Obama Era, Jason L. Riley, The Wall Street Journal, November 4, 2012
  7. ^ "National Vital Statistics Reports" (PDF). 68 (13). November 27, 2019: nine. Retrieved 1 January 2021.
  8. ^ a b c d e Pew Research Intermarriage in the U.Southward. 50 Years Afterwards Loving v. Virginia May eighteen, 2017
  9. ^ Wong, Linda Y. (2003). "Why so only five.5% of Black Men Marry White Women?". International Economic Review. 44 (iii): 803–826. doi:10.1111/1468-2354.T01-1-00090. S2CID 45703289.
  10. ^ Morgan, Southward.; Antonio McDaniel; Andrew T. Miller; Samuel H. Preston. (1993). "Racial differences in household and family structure at the turn of the century". American Journal of Folklore. 98 (4): 799–828. doi:10.1086/230090. S2CID 145358763.
  11. ^ a b c Washington, Jesse (2010-eleven-06). "Blacks struggle with 72 percentage unwed mothers rate - Boston.com". AP . Retrieved 31 July 2014.
  12. ^ a b c Daniel P. Moynihan, The Negro Family unit: The Case for National Action, Washington, D.C., Office of Policy Planning and Enquiry, U.S. Department of Labor, 1965.
  13. ^ a b c d east f m Ruggles, S. (1994). The origins of African-American family construction. American Sociological Review, 136–151.
  14. ^ Hershberg, Theodore (Winter 1971–1972). "Free Blacks in Antebellum Philadelphia: A Study of Ex-Slaves, Freeborn, and Socioeconomic Reject". Journal of Social History. v (2): 190. doi:10.1353/jsh/five.two.183. JSTOR 3786411. Data from the Abolitionist and Quaker censuses, the U. S. Census of 1880 and W. East. B. Du Bois' study of the seventh ward in 1896–97 indicate, in each instance, that ii-parent households were characteristic of 78 per centum of blackness families.
  15. ^ Giordano, Joseph; Levine, Irving M. (Wintertime 1977). "Carter'due south Family Policy: The Pluralist's Challenge". Journal of Current Social Issues. 14 (one): l. ISSN 0041-7211. Reproduced in White House Conference on Families, 1978: Joint Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Child and Human Development of the Committee on Human Resource, United States Senate... Washington: U.S. Authorities Press Function. 1978. p. 490.
  16. ^ National Review, April four, 1994, p. 24.
  17. ^ Lofquist, Daphne; Terry Lugaila; Martin O'Connell; Sarah Feliz. "Households and Families: 2010" (PDF). US Census Bureau, American Community Survey Briefs. Retrieved 15 April 2013.
  18. ^ Camarota, y Steven A. "Births to Unmarried Mothers by Nativity and Instruction". Center for Immigration Studies . Retrieved 8 July 2020.
  19. ^ "Blackness Wedlock in America". Blackdemographics.com/. Akiim DeShay. Retrieved eight July 2020.
  20. ^ a b c d e f thou h i Billingsley, Andrew (1992). Climbing Jacob's Ladder . New York, New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 32. ISBN9780671677084.
  21. ^ a b Paul C. Glick, ed. by Harriette Pipes McAdoo (1997). Blackness families (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. p. 119. ISBN0803955723.
  22. ^ a b c Paul C. Glick, ed. by Harriette Pipes McAdoo (1997). Black families (3rd ed.). Chiliad Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. p. 120. ISBN0803955723.
  23. ^ a b Stewart, James (1990). "Back to Basics: The Significance of Du Bois'due south and Frazier's Contributions for Gimmicky Inquiry on Black Families". In Cheatham,Harold and James Stewart (ed.). Blackness Families Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. p. 10.
  24. ^ Louis, Jacobson. "CNN's Don Lemon says more than than 72 percentage of African-American births are out of matrimony". Politifact . Retrieved February three, 2021.
  25. ^ Paul C. Glick, ed. by Harriette Pipes McAdoo (1997). Black families (tertiary ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. pp. 119–120. ISBN0803955723.
  26. ^ Giddings, Andrew Billingsley ; foreword by Paula (1992). Climbing Jacob's ladder : the enduring legacy of African-American families (Pbk. ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 42. ISBN067167708X.
  27. ^ a b Giddings, Andrew Billingsley ; foreword by Paula (1992). Climbing Jacob's ladder : the indelible legacy of African-American families (Pbk. ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 44. ISBN067167708X.
  28. ^ Paul C. Glick, ed. past Harriette Pipes McAdoo (1997). Black families (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. p. 124. ISBN0803955723.
  29. ^ Paul C. Glick, ed. by Harriette Pipes McAdoo (1997). Black families (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. p. 121. ISBN0803955723.
  30. ^ U.S. Agency of the Demography "Table 60. Married Couples by Race and Hispanic Origin of Spouses" Archived 2015-01-01 at the Wayback Machine, December 15, 2010 (Excel tabular array Archived 2012-10-13 at the Wayback Machine)
  31. ^ U.S. Agency of the Census "Statistical Abstruse of the The states, 1982-83" [ permanent expressionless link ] , 1983. Section 1: Population, file 1982-02.pdf, 170 pp.
  32. ^ Fryer, Jr., Roland G. (Spring 2007). "Guess Who'due south Been Coming to Dinner? Trends in Interracial Wedlock over the 20th Century". Periodical of Economic Perspectives. 21 (two): 71–90. doi:ten.1257/jep.21.2.71. S2CID 12895779.
  33. ^ Stewart, James (1990). "Dorsum to Basics: The Significance of Du Bois's and Frazier'southward Contributions for Contemporary Research on Black Families". In Cheatham,Harold and James Stewart (ed.). Black Families Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. p. 12.
  34. ^ Stewart, James (1990). "Back to Basics: The Significance of Du Bois'south and Frazier'due south Contributions for Contemporary Inquiry on Black Families". In Cheatham,Harold and James Stewart (ed.). Blackness Families Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. p. 20.
  35. ^ Thomas, P. A.; Krampe, E. Chiliad.; Newton, R. R. (19 March 2007). "Father Presence, Family unit Structure, and Feelings of Closeness to the Father Amidst Developed African American Children". Journal of Blackness Studies. 38 (iv): 529–546. doi:x.1177/0021934705286101. S2CID 143241093.
  36. ^ a b c Thomas, P. A.; Krampe, E. Yard.; Newton, R. R. (19 March 2007). "Father Presence, Family Structure, and Feelings of Closeness to the Male parent Among Developed African American Children". Journal of Black Studies. 38 (4): 536. doi:10.1177/0021934705286101. S2CID 143241093.
  37. ^ Thomas, P. A.; Krampe, E. M.; Newton, R. R. (19 March 2007). "Male parent Presence, Family Structure, and Feelings of Closeness to the Father Among Adult African American Children". Journal of Black Studies. 38 (4): 531. doi:10.1177/0021934705286101. S2CID 143241093.
  38. ^ Thomas, P. A.; Krampe, E. Thou.; Newton, R. R. (19 March 2007). "Begetter's Presence, Family Structure, and Feelings of Closeness to the Father Amongst Developed African American Children". Journal of Black Studies. 38 (4): 541. doi:10.1177/0021934705286101. S2CID 143241093.
  39. ^ Thomas, P. A.; Krampe, Eastward. G.; Newton, R. R. (nineteen March 2007). "Male parent Presence, Family Structure, and Feelings of Closeness to the Father Amongst Adult African American Children". Periodical of Black Studies. 38 (4): 542. doi:10.1177/0021934705286101. S2CID 143241093.
  40. ^ Thomas, P. A.; Krampe, East. K.; Newton, R. R. (nineteen March 2007). "Male parent Presence, Family Structure, and Feelings of Closeness to the Begetter Amongst Developed African American Children". Journal of Black Studies. 38 (4): 544. doi:10.1177/0021934705286101. S2CID 143241093.
  41. ^ John McAdoo, ed. by Harriette Pipes McAdoo (1997). Blackness families (3rd ed.). Grand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. pp. 184–186. ISBN0803955723.
  42. ^ Allen, Quaylan (2016-08-08). "'Tell your ain story': manhood, masculinity and racial socialization among blackness fathers and their sons". Ethnic and Racial Studies. 39 (10): 1831–1848. doi:10.1080/01419870.2015.1110608. ISSN 0141-9870. S2CID 147515010.
  43. ^ Wilson, Melvin (1995). African American family life its structural and ecological aspects. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 5–22. ISBN0787999164.
  44. ^ a b editor, Melvin N. Wilson (1995). African American family unit life its structural and ecological aspects. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. p. 9. ISBN0787999164.
  45. ^ a b c editor, Melvin N. Wilson (1995). African American family life its structural and ecological aspects. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. p. ten. ISBN0787999164.
  46. ^ editor, Melvin N. Wilson (1995). African American family unit life its structural and ecological aspects. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. p. 7. ISBN0787999164.
  47. ^ a b edited past Norma J. Burgess; Eurnestine Dark-brown (2000). African American women : an ecological perspective. New York [u.a.]: Falmer Press. p. 59. ISBN0815315910.
  48. ^ editor, Melvin N. Wilson (1995). African American family life its structural and ecological aspects. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 6–7. ISBN0787999164.
  49. ^ edited past Norma J. Burgess; Eurnestine Brown (2000). African American women : an ecological perspective. New York [u.a.]: Falmer Press. pp. 58–59. ISBN0815315910.
  50. ^ Margaret Spencer, edited by Harold E. Cheatham; Stewart, James B. (1990). Black families : interdisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, Due north.J.: Transaction Publishers. pp. 111–112. ISBN0887388124.
  51. ^ Margaret Spencer, edited by Harold E. Cheatham; Stewart, James B. (1990). Blackness families : interdisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, Due north.J.: Transaction Publishers. p. 112. ISBN0887388124.
  52. ^ Margaret Spencer, edited by Harold E. Cheatham; Stewart, James B. (1990). Black families : interdisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, Due north.J.: Transaction Publishers. pp. 124–125. ISBN0887388124.
  53. ^ a b Billingsley, Andrew (1992). Climbing Jacob's Ladder . New York, New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 58. ISBN9780671677084.
  54. ^ a b Giddings, Andrew Billingsley ; foreword by Paula (1992). Climbing Jacob'southward ladder : the enduring legacy of African-American families (Pbk. ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 60–61. ISBN067167708X.
  55. ^ a b c d e Jones, Deborah J.; Zalot, Alecia A.; Foster, Sarah Eastward.; Sterrett, Emma; Chester, Charlene (22 December 2006). "A Review of Childrearing in African American Single Mother Families: The Relevance of a Coparenting Framework". Periodical of Child and Family Studies. 16 (v): 671–683. doi:10.1007/s10826-006-9115-0. S2CID 12970902.
  56. ^ Gordy, Cynthia. "Welfare, Fathers and Those Persistent Myths". The Root . Retrieved 2019-04-29 .
  57. ^ a b c McDaniel, Antonio (1990). "The Power of Culture: A Review of the Idea of Africa'southward Influence on Family Structure in Antebellum America". Journal of Family History. 15 (2): 225–238. doi:10.1177/036319909001500113. S2CID 143705470.
  58. ^ Williams, Walter Eastward. (June eight, 2005). "Victimhood: Rhetoric or reality?". Jewish World Review. Creators Syndicate. Archived from the original on Nov eleven, 2005. Retrieved June one, 2020.
  59. ^ a b Sowell, Thomas (August 16, 2004). "A painful ceremony". Creators Syndicate. Archived from the original on Baronial xviii, 2004. Retrieved June 1, 2020.
  60. ^ MacLean, Nancy. The American Women's Motility, 1945–2000: A Cursory History with Documents (2008)
  61. ^ a b c d due east f thou h i j m l m northward o Dixon, P (2009). "Wedlock among African Americans: What does the enquiry reveal?". Journal of African American Studies. 13 (ane): 29–46. doi:10.1007/s12111-008-9062-5. S2CID 143539013.
  62. ^ a b Ruggles, Steven (1997). "The rise of divorce and separation in the U.s.a., 1880–1990". Demography. 34 (iv): 455–466. doi:10.2307/3038300. JSTOR 3038300. PMC3065932. PMID 9545625.
  63. ^ a b c d e Akerlof, 1000. A.; Yellen, J. L.; Katz, M. L. (1996). "An analysis of out-of-marriage childbearing in the United States". The Quarterly Periodical of Economics. 111 (two): 277–317. doi:x.2307/2946680. JSTOR 2946680.
  64. ^ Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2006 Archived 2013-03-03 at the Wayback Machine (NCJ 217675). U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Male person incarceration by race. The percentages are for adult males, and are from page 1 of the PDF file Archived 2011-10-27 at the Wayback Machine.
  65. ^ a b Dyer, West.M (2005). "Prison Fathers, and Identity: A Theory of How Incarceration Affects Men's Paternal Identity". Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice About Men equally Fathers. 3 (iii): 201–219. doi:x.3149/fth.0303.201. S2CID 12297600.
  66. ^ a b c Brown, Tony; Patterson, Evelyn (28 June 2016). "Wounds From Incarceration that Never Heal". The New Democracy. The New Republic. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
  67. ^ Price, Lee. "Racial bigotry continues to play a part in hiring decisions". Economic Policy Institute. EPI. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
  68. ^ Wildeman, Christopher (September 2010). "Paternal Incarceration and Children's Physically Aggressive Behaviors: Testify from the Delicate Families and Child Wellbeing Study". Social Forces. 89 (ane): 285–309. doi:10.1353/sof.2010.0055. S2CID 45247503.
  69. ^ Rose M. Rivers, ed. by Harriette Pipes McAdoo; John Scanzoni (1997). Black families (3rd ed.). M Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. p. 334. ISBN0803955723.
  70. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Heiss, Jerold (Baronial 1996). "Effects of African American Family Structure on Schoolhouse Attitudes and Functioning". Social Problems. 43 (3): 246–267. doi:10.2307/3096977. JSTOR 3096977.
  71. ^ a b Staples, [compiled past] Robert (1998). The black Family : essays and studies (6th ed.). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Pub. Co. pp. 343–349. ISBN9780534552961.
  72. ^ a b Staples, [compiled past] Robert (1998). The black family : essays and studies (6th ed.). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Pub. Co. pp. 37–58. ISBN9780534552961.
  73. ^ a b c Claude, J. (1986). Poverty patterns for blackness men and women. The Blackness Scholar, 17(5), xx–23.
  74. ^ a b U.S. Census Agency. Current Population Survey. People in Families by Family Construction, Age, and Sex, Iterated past Income-to-Poverty Ratio and Race: 2007: Below 100% of Poverty – All Races Archived 2008-09-thirty at the Wayback Machine.
  75. ^ a b U.S. Census Bureau. Current Population Survey. People in Families by Family Construction, Historic period, and Sex, Iterated by Income-to-Poverty Ratio and Race: 2007: Below 100% of Poverty – White Alone Archived 2009-04-thirteen at the Wayback Motorcar.
  76. ^ a b "Poverty 3-Part 100_06". Pubdb3.census.gov. 2008-08-26. Archived from the original on 2011-06-12. Retrieved 2010-09-xvi .
  77. ^ a b "Poverty two-Part 100_09". Pubdb3.census.gov. 2008-08-26. Archived from the original on 2010-01-08. Retrieved 2010-09-sixteen .
  78. ^ a b c d Cain, D. S., & Combs-Orme, T. (2005). Family construction effects on parenting stress and practices in the African American family. J. Soc. & Soc. Welfare, 32, 19.
  79. ^ Zimmerman, M. A.; Salem, D. A.; Maton, K. I. (1995). "Family unit Structure and Psychosocial Correlates amid Urban African‐American Adolescent Males". Child Evolution. 66 (6): 1598–1613. doi:x.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00954.x. PMID 8556888. Regardless of the causality, researchers have plant a consistent relationship between the electric current African American family structure and poverty, educational activity, and pregnancy.
  80. ^ a b c d Dittus, P. J.; Jaccard, J.; Gordon, V. V. (1997). "The bear upon of African American fathers on boyish sexual behavior". Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 26 (4): 445–465. doi:10.1023/a:1024533422103. S2CID 142626784.
  81. ^ Scott, Joseph (1993). "African American Daughter-Female parent Relations and Teenage Pregnancy: Two Faces of Premarital Teenage Pregnancy". Western Journal of Black Studies. 17 (2): 73–81. PMID 12346138.
  82. ^ Yacob, Anaiah (2015-02-06). "The State of Black Family Construction 2015: A Curse of Dysfunctional Family". WhoAreIsraelites.Org . Retrieved 2016-11-06 .
  83. ^ Moore, Mignon; P. Lindsay Chase-Lansdale (2001). "Sexual Intercourse and Pregnancy amid African American Girls in High-Poverty Neighborhoods: The Role of Family unit and Perceived Community Environs". Journal of Marriage and Family. 63 (four): 1146–1157. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01146.x.
  84. ^ a b c d e f g h Magnet, Myron (2008). "The Great African-American Awakening". City Journal. 18 (3).
  85. ^ a b c d e f chiliad h i j k 50 m northward Hattery, Angela J.; Smith, Earl (2007). African American families. Chiliad Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. ISBN9781412924665.

mckelveymeas1939.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-American_family_structure

0 Response to "Roles of African American Men in the Family Make Up"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel